
Our client was able to produce receipts for all of the customized work that had been done to the motorcycle. Our firm filed a lawsuit, in which we named both insurance companies, and the at fault driver. The rationale was that the value of the motorcycle was only $11,000 despite the fact that it had been customized. Which breaks down to $11,000 for the motorcycle, and $17,700 for medical bills, and suffering. The both insurance companies involved, our clients and the at-fault driver’s insurance company, wanted to settle the case for $28,700. The police report indicated that motorcycles head lamp was still illuminated.
#Motorcycle leather bag repair albany ny driver
The driver claimed that he did not see our client, nor her motorcycle. The police report cited the driver making the left with 100% fault for failure to yield the right of way. Her customized bike however, was damaged severely, resulting in a total loss.

Our client sustained minor injuries that required treatment at the local hospital. As she approached an intersection with a green light, she was struck by an oncoming vehicle that was making a left turn. In August of 2013, our client was driving to work on her customized motorcycle in a city, in New York. A settlement may have been further expedited if our client had sought legal assistance immediately, but he first attempted to seek claims payments from the other driver’s insurance company on his own. In all, the case took approximately six months from the initial complaint to final mediation. Insurance companies for both defendants made compensation payments to our client which covered his out-of-pocket medical costs, lost wages, and some amount for pain and suffering. The suit was settled out of court with both parties. The suit named both the homeowner and the sedan driver as defendants. We filed a lawsuit on behalf of our client seeking damages for loss of property, loss of wages, and medical expenses.
#Motorcycle leather bag repair albany ny full
The other driver’s insurance originally denied the full claim for property damage and medical coverage, citing the negligence of the homeowner in blocking visibility at the intersection. He also missed several weeks of work during recovery and required physical therapy to rehab injuries to his shoulder. Our client suffered injuries that required hospitalization. A report filed by police officers cited the sedan driver with failure to yield and a rolling stop, but also noted that the sedan driver indicated yard debris piled at the curb by a homeowner made it impossible to see the approaching motorcycle. Our client had no stop sign, and thus had the right-of-way at the intersection.

At the same time, a driver in a sedan pulled up to the intersection to make a left-hand turn.Īccident reports indicate the sedan driver was required to make a full stop, as indicated by a stop sign. He approached an intersection at the correct speed, intending to cross through the intersection. All of his medical bills were paid for as was the damage to his motorcycle.ĭuring the summer of 2013, our client was enjoying a casual motorcycle ride in a suburban area. Chaz was thrilled with the recovery as it was far more than he ever expected to receive. CASE RESULTSĭue to our ability to establish fault on several levels and complete disregard for Chaz, we were able to recover funds for his pain and suffering and our property damage expert also got him complete reimbursement for the damage to his bike. The motorcycle with less than 300 miles and only three months, was totaled and Chaz was put in the hospital for three weeks as the result of a fractured leg and ligament damage in his wrist that required two operations to repair. The turn was illegal for two reasons: she both failed to signal before making the turn and she attempted to accelerate through a yellow light at the intersection where Chaz was parked. We proved that this condition should have been taken into account before she got in her car.Īdditionally, the circumstances of the case were exacerbated by the fact that the female driver was making an illegal turn at the time of the accident. In addition, the driver claimed that her visibility was poor due to the fact that she was driving eastbound just after sunrise. The Haymond Law Firm established that she was speeding and was following too closely.

This can often result in a much higher financial award if brought to the attention of the insurance companies lawyer or a jury. The driver of the car also committed several other negligent acts. According to Connecticut law, Courts take into account the number of different negligent acts that take place at the time of the accident. Chaz Demarco was riding his motorcycle when he was hit from behind by a driver who was talking on the phone at the time of the accident.
